‘In the original
Gothic, women were often presented as trembling victims pursued by predatory
males.’ How far is this true of the first narrative in Angela Carter’s
collection, ‘The Bloody Chamber’?
To some extent the women in ‘The Bloody Chamber’ fit the
traditional role of ‘trembling victims’ in the Gothic, for example through the
mostly passive role the narrator takes in the story; similar to the passive
role of Isabella in Horace Walpole’s ‘The Castle of Otranto’. However, as a
feminist, Carter also challenges this role and makes the women in her story
stronger; even able to overpower the male characters. This is most noticeable
in the character of the mother. In addition to this, Carter also explores the
role of men in the gothic. The Marquis takes the archetypal role of the
predatory male villain of a gothic novel; comparable to Bram Stoker’s Count
Dracula in his brutality. Despite this, the role of the gothic male is also
challenged, mainly through the character of Jean-Yves who offers a more comforting,
vulnerable male character who is almost the complete opposite of the Marquis.
One
way in which the women in ‘The Bloody Chamber’ are traditional stereotypes of
gothic females is through the way in which they are passive within the story.
The narrator herself is a passive character throughout much of the story,
following what the Marquis wants her to do, for example pretending to be
surprised just to please him, ‘I was forced always to mimic surprise’, which
shows how she tries to please him. Furthermore, the extent of his control over
her, symbolised by the ‘ruby choker’, also emphasises her passivity within the
story. This motif is echoed later on within the book in ‘The Courtship of Mr
Lyon’, with the dog wearing chokers as collars. This control echoes the control
men hold over women and their passive nature within the traditional gothic. Another
way in which the women follow the traditional role of gothic females is in how
they are objects of desire for the male characters. The narrator describes the
Marquis having ‘the assessing eye of a connoisseur inspecting horseflesh’
whilst he looks at her; showing how she is an object of his desire. The word
‘horseflesh’ objectifies the narrator and makes her seem like a commodity. In
addition to this, the narrator also objectifies herself through the parts of
herself that she describes, such as ‘breasts’ and ‘thighs’. In doing this, she
is almost becoming masculine in her description, as she is focusing on aspects
of herself that men tend to focus on. This in turn shows her passivity and
complacency in the role that she is set in as a weak female, and emphasises her
lack of action. The women in ‘The Bloody Chamber’ are also shown to be typical
of the traditional Gothic through their emotional responses. The narrator is
portrayed as being somewhat petty towards her nurse when she says that ‘opals
are unlucky’; and turns away ‘pettishly’. In addition to this, the narrator
also follows the typical pattern of feeling sympathy for the monster, similar
to that of Mina in Dracula, as she talks about the ‘atrocious loneliness of
that monster’. This sympathy is typical of Victorian Gothic women; reflecting
the compassionate and caring nature a Victorian woman was expected to have.
Despite this, Carter also challenges these stereotypes
created by the traditional gothic. The main character within this story that
challenges this is the narrator’s mother, who is described as having ‘shot a
man-eating tiger’ when she was younger. By doing this, she is showing her
strength and bravery as a character. Furthermore, her strength is shown through
the fact that she is the one who saves the narrator. In the original story, the
heroine is saved by her brothers. By changing this, Carter is showing the
reader that women can also take on positions of power. However, the mother has
to take on a phallic symbol, the gun, in order to have power, which suggests
that women have to take on masculine aspects in order to be powerful. In
addition, despite being passive for a majority of the tale, the narrator
becomes an active agent by the end. This can be seen through how she ‘runs to
the assistance’ of Jean-Yves and helps him to let her mother in. Furthermore,
it could also be argued that through opening and embracing the bloody chamber
she is being active. This embracing of the bloody chamber is the narrator
embracing and accepting the dark desires that Carter argues are within all of
us, as shown by the way in which she touches the body of the opera singer. Another
way in which the women differ from the traditional gothic is the way in which they
take away power from the men within the novel, without being the stereotypical
femme fatale. The narrator does this by controlling Jean-Yves. She physically
does this when she ‘leads’ him down to the courtyard. Furthermore, her control
extends to after the Marquis is dead, as she defies social convention and takes
control of the money she inherits. Women also take power away from men through
the fact that the mother kills the Marquis. Through taking power away from the
male characters, Carter is criticising the usual fairy tale, as well as the traditional
gothic, for the lack of female strength and independence. It could also be
interpreted that, by giving her female characters more power, she is also giving
them more of a voice within fairytales, rather than making them passive
characters. This is emphasised throughout the collection, which acts as one
entire story.
The male characters within ‘The Bloody Chamber’, particularly
the Marquis, could be argued to be predatory for the way in which he ‘hunts’
for women. The narrator says that he ‘had been married before, more than once’
at the beginning of the story, which hints to the reader at his predatory
nature. Furthermore, the range in type of woman he goes after, Romanian
Countess, opera singer and model, hints at how he enjoys wooing and trapping
them. His predatory nature can also be seen through how thought out and planned
each murder is, for example he ‘strangles’ the opera singer and as a result
takes away her voice; the thing that presumably drew him to her in the first
place. This action could be interpreted as him trying to control them by taking
possession of their best attributes or the things they enjoy the most. He also
controls his wives through the jewellery he forces them to wear, in the ‘opal
ring’ and ‘ruby choker’. The narrator says about the ring that ‘every bride who
came to the castle wore it’, hinting not only at the Marquis’ need for control,
but also at an ancestral need for control, which is further hinted at with the
story Jean-Yves tells the narrator about an old Marquis who used to ‘hunt young
girls’. The ruby choker, specific to the narrator, foreshadows the death that
he plans out for her, as well as acting like a collar similar to that in ‘The
Courtship of Mr Lyon’. Carter explores a need for control in her male
characters later within the collection in ‘The Erl-King’ through his actions of
turning women into birds. The Marquis is also predatory simply in his physical
description. Carter uses leonine imagery, similar to that in ‘The Courtship of
Mr Lyon’, for example his hair is described as a ‘curling mane’. Carter does
this to evoke connotations of a predator, adding to his predatory nature, as
well as making the narrator appear more innocent.
However, as a feminist writer,
Carter also challenges the gothic stereotype of a predatory male in order to
make the characters more equal. The male character that most challenges this is
the piano tuner Jean-Yves. As he is blind, he is unable to control the narrator
through his male gaze, and therefore is less powerful than she is. Jean-Yves
also offers comfort to the narrator, ‘I can be of some comfort to you’, in
direct contrast to the threatening nature of the Marquis. It could also be
argued that the Marquis somewhat challenges the gothic norm, as it could be
considered that he cannot help but kill, or is reluctant to, much like the
countess in ‘The Lady of the House of Love’. This is shown when the narrator
says ‘it seemed to me he was in despair’, suggesting that he is stuck in his
condition and, possibly, genuinely loved the narrator.
Overall, Carter uses a combination of modern and traditional
gothic elements to create her characters. However, they mostly adhere to the
stereotypes within the traditional Victorian gothic in order to lead the reader
into the book, rather than simply starting with her more controversial
ideologies.


